Sydney Shall
2015-12-07 11:41:53 UTC
Message: 4
Date: Sun, 06 Dec 2015 22:01:40 -0500
Subject: Re: [Numpy-discussion] array of random numbers fails to
construct
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Allan,
I see with a google search on your name that you are in the physics
department at Rutgers. I got my BA in Physics there. 1975. Biological
physics. A thought: Is there an entropy that can be assigned to the dna in
an organism? I don't mean the usual thing, coupled to the heat bath.
Evolution blindly explores metabolic and signalling pathways, and tends
towards disorder, as long as it functions. Someone working out signaling
pathways some years ago wrote that they were senselessly complex, branched
and interlocked. I think that is to be expected. Evolution doesn't find
minimalist, clear, rational solutions. Look at the amazon rain forest. What
are all those beetles and butterflies and frogs for? It is the wrong
question. I think some measure of the complexity could be related to the
amount of time that ecosystem has existed. Similarly for genomes.
Dear David,Date: Sun, 06 Dec 2015 22:01:40 -0500
Subject: Re: [Numpy-discussion] array of random numbers fails to
construct
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Allan,
I see with a google search on your name that you are in the physics
department at Rutgers. I got my BA in Physics there. 1975. Biological
physics. A thought: Is there an entropy that can be assigned to the dna in
an organism? I don't mean the usual thing, coupled to the heat bath.
Evolution blindly explores metabolic and signalling pathways, and tends
towards disorder, as long as it functions. Someone working out signaling
pathways some years ago wrote that they were senselessly complex, branched
and interlocked. I think that is to be expected. Evolution doesn't find
minimalist, clear, rational solutions. Look at the amazon rain forest. What
are all those beetles and butterflies and frogs for? It is the wrong
question. I think some measure of the complexity could be related to the
amount of time that ecosystem has existed. Similarly for genomes.
You are mistaken in this remark in your message;
Evolution blindly explores metabolic and signalling pathways, and
tends towards disorder, as long as it functions.
In fact, biological evolution does just the opposite.tends towards disorder, as long as it functions.
It overcomes disorder and creates complexity at the expense of 'pulling
in' energy from the outside, from the environemnt.
Of course you are correct that biological evolution does NOT look for
nor does it achieve optimum solutions. It merely replaces current
mechanism with another mechanism biologically derived from the current
mechanism, provided only that the replacement mechanism is marginally,
fractionally superior in the totality of the life of the ecosystem.
Have a good day,
Sydney
--
Sydney
Sydney